Singapore's MAS Caps Licensed Crypto Firms at 33 After June 2025 Deadline
Central bank maintains cautious stance on speculation while advancing institutional digital asset projects.
By Daniel Cheung·March 21, 2026·4 min readOrionmano Industries
Central bank maintains cautious stance on speculation while advancing institutional digital asset projects.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore completed its crypto licensing crackdown by June 2025, granting licenses to only 33 firms, underscoring its commitment to regulatory rigor over market breadth. The June 30, 2025 deadline required all digital payment token (DPT) service providers—whether operating domestically or deriving minimal revenue from overseas clients—to obtain a licence from MAS or cease operations. The result is a deliberately constrained ecosystem: just 33 licensed DPT service providers now operate in Singapore, a figure that reflects the central bank's calculated choice of a smaller, more regulated market over the broader, less controlled approach adopted by competing jurisdictions.
Strict Licensing Regime Takes Effect
MAS's comprehensive licensing framework covers four categories of DPT services: transfer of digital payment tokens, exchange between digital tokens and fiat currency, token custody services, and promotion of token-related services. Crucially, the regulation applies regardless of business scale or the proportion of revenue derived from overseas clients. Even firms where foreign customers represent a minimal fraction of revenue must comply fully with MAS requirements.
The licensing regime was enforced by June 30, 2025, following a transitional period that allowed firms to operate while their applications were under review. As of the deadline, only 33 digital payment token service providers currently operate under MAS licence. This narrow aperture reflects a deliberate strategic choice: Singapore opted for a smaller, more regulated ecosystem over a broader approach that might have admitted more firms but at the cost of supervisory quality.
Industry analysts have characterized the outcome as a "great crypto licensing shake-up," noting that the ultimate measure of success will be "not in the number of firms operating from Singapore, but in the quality of institutional adoption and the stability of the digital asset ecosystem that emerges."
Exhibit
Number of Licensed Digital Payment Token Service Providers in Singapore (2025)
Only 33 firms licensed after the June 2025 regulatory deadline
Source: Orionmano Industries
Institutional Innovation Projects Advance
Notwithstanding its cautious stance on speculative cryptocurrency activity, MAS continues to champion institutional digital asset infrastructure through a suite of public-private initiatives. Project Orchid explores the design and issuance of a digital Singapore dollar, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that could enable programmable payments and enhance settlement efficiency. Project Guardian examines public blockchain infrastructure for wholesale financial applications, including tokenized assets and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols subject to regulatory guardrails. Global Layer One develops blockchain infrastructure specifically designed for financial institutions, aiming to create a permissioned, interoperable layer for institutional-grade digital asset activity.
These projects target institutional investors who prioritize regulatory certainty over market breadth. The strategy aligns with a broader global trend: as the tone of rulemaking shifts from risk-aversion to competitiveness—driven partly by U.S. policy developments and the rotation of institutional capital into digital assets—Singapore's quality-over-quantity approach may prove attractive to large asset managers and banks seeking a stable, legally predictable environment for digital asset operations.
Industry participants have noted that Singapore's approach creates "market confidence in Singapore's approach to digital asset regulation," a sentiment that could differentiate the city-state as other jurisdictions grapple with fragmented regulatory frameworks or permissive regimes that struggle to maintain supervisory integrity.
Controlled Experimentation Through Sandboxes and Partnerships
MAS encourages digital asset innovation through controlled experimentation, utilizing a FinTech Regulatory Sandbox that allows firms to test products and services in a supervised environment with reduced regulatory burdens. The sandbox framework enables MAS to gather empirical evidence on emerging business models before determining appropriate permanent regulatory treatment.
The central bank also employs a tiered licensing approach, providing more assistance to small-scale startups in meeting compliance standards while imposing tighter obligations as firms scale—measured by assets under management, user base, or transaction volumes. This graduated structure aims to reduce barriers to entry for innovative startups while ensuring that larger, systemically relevant firms face commensurate regulatory requirements.
Knowledge-sharing ventures further extend MAS's experimental approach. Projects Ubin and Guardian involve partnerships between MAS and private-sector entities to explore distributed ledger technology applications, from cross-border payments to asset tokenization. Industry observers recommend that MAS should continue expanding these projects to include more asset types—particularly derivatives with intricate characteristics—and more firms, in order to identify and resolve scalability issues before deployment at commercial scale.
This controlled experimentation strategy positions Singapore to gather real-world data on digital asset risks and opportunities without compromising financial stability. The sandbox model, combined with institutional innovation projects and knowledge-sharing ventures, reflects a regulatory philosophy that distinguishes between speculative cryptocurrency trading—which MAS continues to treat with caution—and the development of institutional-grade digital asset infrastructure.