Wednesday, May 27, 2026

OM Industries

The Orionmano Research Imprint

Singapore's Three D-SIBs Held Combined Assets Over S$1.5 Trillion in 2024

The trio—DBS, OCBC, and UOB—anchor a banking sector that grew at 6.8% CAGR from 2021-2024, with strong capital buffers.

By Lucia FerrariNovember 19, 20255 min read

The trio—DBS, OCBC, and UOB—anchor a banking sector that grew at 6.8% CAGR from 2021-2024, with strong capital buffers.

Singapore's D-SIB Designation and Banking Landscape

Singapore's banking sector is anchored by three Domestic Systemically Important Banks (D-SIBs) designated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore: DBS Bank, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation (OCBC), and United Overseas Bank (UOB). These institutions are deemed systemically important due to their size, interconnectedness, and critical role in the domestic financial system. The total assets of Singapore's banking sector grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.8% from 2021 to 2024, as reported in the MAS Annual Report 2024/2025, reflecting sustained expansion even amid global economic headwinds. This growth underscores the sector's centrality to Singapore's economy—banking assets represented 597.8% of GDP in 2021, according to the IMF's Article IV Consultation for Singapore published in 2024.

Combined Assets Exceed S$1.5 Trillion

As of 2024, Singapore's three D-SIBs held combined total assets exceeding S$1.5 trillion, according to MAS data summarised in public reporting. This figure places the trio among the largest banking groups in Southeast Asia by asset size. For context, Maybank Singapore, a Qualifying Full Bank and D-SIB designated by MAS, reported total assets of S$80.97 billion as of the first half of 2024—a scale that illustrates the magnitude of the top-three banks' balance sheets. Beyond sheer asset size, the three D-SIBs dominate the domestic loan market. As of 1H2024, DBS held 15.1% of the loans market share, UOB 12.4%, and OCBC 9.9%, giving the trio a combined share of 37.4% according to Maybank's Investor Presentation published in October 2024. This concentration means that the health of the three D-SIBs is effectively the health of Singapore's credit market.

Capital Strength and Provisioning Buffers

Despite their substantial asset base and market dominance, Singapore's D-SIBs maintain robust capital buffers that exceed regulatory requirements. As of Q3 2024, the aggregate Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio for the three D-SIBs stood at 16.6%, according to the MAS Financial Stability Review (FSR) published in November 2024. This is more than double the regulatory minimum CET1 requirement of 6.5% set by MAS, and comfortably above the combined 9.0% minimum plus capital conservation buffer (CCB) that D-SIBs must maintain. The MAS FSR further notes that D-SIBs have "maintained robust credit risk management practices and adequate provisioning buffers to cushion against potential credit losses amid uncertainties in the global macroeconomic outlook." The total provisioning coverage ratio, which measures total provisions against total unsecured non-performing assets, has remained adequate across the cycle.

Exhibit

D-SIBs' Aggregate CET1 Capital Ratio vs. Regulatory Minimum, Q3 2024

16.6% aggregate CET1 ratio far exceeds the 6.5% minimum requirement.

Percent of Risk-Weighted Assets (%)Source: Orionmano Industries

The resilience of these capital and provisioning positions was further validated by the MAS Industry-Wide Stress Test (IWST) conducted in 2024. Under the exercise's adverse scenario—which assumed renewed inflationary pressures and a global recession—the aggregate CET1 capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of the D-SIBs was projected to remain above the combined minimum CET1 regulatory requirement of 6.5% and the 9.0% CCB threshold. The adverse scenario specifically tested a sharp rise in credit risk, with credit risk-weighted assets (RWA) projected to increase by 3.9 percentage points under stress. Despite this, the MAS concluded that "D-SIBs' capital buffers are sufficient to withstand such a severe macrofinancial shock."

Regulatory Oversight and Stress-Testing Framework

The Monetary Authority of Singapore maintains a rigorous supervisory framework for D-SIBs that goes beyond baseline Basel III standards. As detailed in the IMF's 2024 Article IV Consultation, MAS requires D-SIBs to maintain a minimum CET1 CAR of 6.5%, Tier 1 CAR of 8.0%, and total CAR of 10.0%, plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer. This framework is complemented by a zero percent countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) as of 2024, a leverage ratio of 3%, and liquidity requirements including a 100% Singapore dollar Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and 100% all-currency LCR for local D-SIBs. These requirements are calibrated to ensure that the systemically important institutions can absorb losses without disrupting the broader financial system.

The IWST 2024 exercise, described in the MAS FSR, required D-SIBs to assess their balance sheets and capital positions under two scenarios—a central scenario and an adverse scenario. Under the adverse scenario, which incorporated a severe macrofinancial shock with elevated credit risk, the decline in the aggregate CET1 CAR was "primarily driven by the rise in credit risk-weighted assets (RWA) (3.9 percentage points)." Despite this pressure, each D-SIB's CET1 CAR was projected to remain well above the minimum regulatory requirement. The stress test's results confirm that the D-SIBs' capital buffers are structurally sufficient to absorb even a severe downturn.

Outlook: Looking ahead, MAS's rigorous stress-testing regime—combined with the banks' strong capital and provisioning positions—should sustain resilience even as global uncertainties pose risks to lending volumes and credit quality. The MAS FSR notes that "persistently high interest rates, slower global economic growth, escalating trade tensions or geopolitical conflicts could raise credit costs and dampen lending volumes, putting pressure on banks' profitability and capital positions." Banks are expected to continue maintaining sound underwriting standards and adequate loan provisions while remaining vigilant against potential liquidity risks. For investors and policymakers monitoring Singapore's financial stability, the D-SIBs' capital adequacy ratios and stress-test results remain the key metrics to track.

Filed under
  • singapore
  • dsib
  • banking
  • financial-stability
  • mas
  • 2024